Instructors believe that children in the classroom create many problems. What do you think? Should parents be allowed to bring their children to class?
Suppose you are at a party off campus. You see that one of your friends is drinking a lot of beer and plans to drive home. Should you let this friend drive back to campus?
Do you believe that the rules for dorm residents should remain in place? That is, do you believe the current dorm rules are fair and reasonable?
Do you believe that freshmen students should be allowed to bring their cars to campus, since it causes people to lose parking spaces and distracts freshmen from their studies?
Suppose a student is causing trouble in your classroom and the teacher kicks him/her out as punishment. Is this fair or unfair? Should you tell someone about it? What would be a reasonable punishment if you were a teacher?
Do you believe that Gallaudet Writing Exams are beneficial to students? Why or why not? If you could, what would you change, keep or modify about the tests? What efforts should be made to change them?
Should prayer in schools be allowed or forbidden? Is this in conflict with the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights (the right to practice freedom of speech and practice any religion)?
Should sex education be taught in public and private high schools? Is it appropriate? Why or why not?
Many parents have complained about explicit material used on TV, in movies and books, thus censorship occurred. Is censorship of books, music, and movies fair?
Are fraternities and sororities beneficial to universities? If they are, how so?
Do you think Gallaudet has strict or flexible dorm policies?
How can Gallaudet improve campus security?
Do you think all people should own cars, or do you think it is better for people to use other kinds of transportation?
Should mothers be allowed to bring their children into the classroom?
Essay on Deaf President Now
478 Words2 Pages
Deaf President Now
Deaf President Now!
All throughout history when an issue or problem presented it's self to a group of individuals. Their voices together would bring about change through toil and determination. However, what if the world couldn't hear your "voice" or understand your language? The degree of effort and work for such a group of people would seem futile. For the students of Gallaudet University, the barrier between the hearing world and the Deaf world could not have stopped them. "On March 6, the decision of the university's Broad of Trustees to name Elisabeth Ann Ziner, a hearing women with no previous knowledge of the deaf community, the university's seventh president." (Van Cleve p.170) Brought…show more content…
Of all the candidates who were up for the presidency of the university, only one of them was not deaf. This fact only fueled the fire when candidate was chosen. More or less sending a message into the deaf community that deaf people still seemed to be less capable or qualified as a hearing person. Yet, although DPN was a movement for equality and many other issues, it was a milestone in the Deaf Culture. "Deaf President Now" showed the world that deaf people and the deaf world could be united around a common issues and "fight." Especially one of this importance. "Gallaudet University represents the pinnacle of education for deaf people, not only in the United States but throughout the world." (Van Cleve p.172) Would it not be fitting for a university founded within deaf culture, be headed by one who was a part of that culture? Obviously there is no question. All throughout the entire "Deaf President Now" movement, the message was clear that deaf people have the self-determination and capability as any other hearing person. To watch hundreds of deaf students and supports protest from Gallaudet University to our nation's capital, using American Sign Language as their only medium of communication. Only shows the effect of the "power and intelligence" (Van Cleve p. 173) behind sign language. "With similar unity in the future, they may move into a